Free legal advice online now Ek Anokha Smaaj.

 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. …… OF 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 12884/2020) GUJARAT STATE CIVIL SUPPLIES CORPORATION LTD. .... APPELLANT VERSUS MAHAKALI FOODS PVT. LTD. (UNIT 2) & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 127 OF 2018 M/S. RAMKRISHNA ELECTRICALS LTD. .…APPELLANT VERSUS MAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD. & ANR. .... RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6167 OF 2013 M/S VIDARBHA CERAMICS PVT. LTD. …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA & ORS .... RESPONDENT(S) WITH 2 CIVIL APPEAL NO. …… OF 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) NO. 31227 OF 2018) GUJARAT STATE PETRONET LTD. …APPELLANT VERSUS KRUNAL ENGINEERING WORKS & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. …… OF 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) NO. 7375 OF 2020) BHARAT ELECTRONICS LTD. &ANR. …APPELLANT(S) VERSUS IBEX INTEGRATED BUSINESS EXPRESS PRIVATE LTD. & ORS. .... RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. …… OF 2...

 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No(s). 6612 /2022 (arising out of SLP(C) No.746/2019) VISHAL & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS YUGRAJ SINGH DHINDSA & ORS. Respondent(s) O R D E R 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellants are before this Court assailing the judgment dated 05.07.2018 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh in FAO No. 4384 of 2013. Through the said judgment, the High Court while enhancing the compensation awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (‘MACT’ for short) through the award dated 08.01.2013, has enhanced the compensation to Rs.8,04,967/-(Rupees Eight Lakhs Four Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty Seven Only) from Rs.4,62,967/- (Rupees Four Lakhs Sixty Two Thousand Nine Hundred and Sixty Seven Only) which was awarded by the MACT but the appellants contend that the just compensation is not awarded. 2 3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the appeal papers. 4. The learned counsel for t...

 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. OF 2022 (arising out of Special Leave Petition (C)No. 15842 of 2019 SMT. YASHODAMMA S. Appellant(s) VERSUS REGIONAL MANAGER RELIANCE Respondent(s) GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. & ANR. O R D E R 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant is assailing the judgment and order dated 27.04.2018, passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru in MFA No. 5178/2017 and MFA No. 3985/2017. 3. Through the said judgment and order, the High Court has reduced the compensation to Rs. 19,74,000/- (Rupees Nineteen Lakhs Seventy Four Thousand Only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum as against the sum of Rs. 33,65,000/- (Rupees Thirty Three Lakhs Sixty Five Thousand Only) with interest at the rate of 8% per annum awarded by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (‘MACT’ for short). 4. The issues relating to the accident having occurred and the son of the claimant having died in the said accident, is not in dispute. 2 5....

AADHAR HOLDER CONSENT FORM In the Court of _________________________________ ______________________________________________ Consent for Authentication                I hereby consent to provide my Aadhaar Number, Biometric and/or One Time Pin(OTP) data for Aadhaar based Authentication for the purpose of establishing my identity in the Court as well as to club all cases (pending or decided) through my Aadhaar number information by District and Sessions Judge, _____________________                  I have no objection in authenticating myself and fully understand that information provided by me shall be used for authenticating my identity through Aadhaar Authentication System for the purpose stated above and no other purpose. I also understand that District & Sessions Judge_______________ shall ensure security/confidentiality of ...

आदमीयो का भी क़ानूनी  अधिकार  है -  बेमतलब की ग्रिफ्तारी और नजरबंदी से बचने का।  मीडिया ने हाल ही में यौन उत्पीड़न के कई मामलों को उजागर किया है, लिव-इन रिलेशनशिप में बलात्कार के आरोप, या झूठे विवाह का वादा करने के बाद बलात्कार। हालांकि इस तरह के मामलों की संख्या में बड़ी वृद्धि हो सकती है, एक और सतर्क रहस्योद्घाटन यह है कि 2013 के बाद से आपराधिक कानून में बदलाव के कारण रिपोर्टिंग में वृद्धि और हाल ही में कई आंदोलनों ने महिलाओं को न्याय किए जाने के डर के बिना बोलने के लिए प्रोत्साहित किया है। इनमें से कई मामले पिछली घटनाओं से संबंधित थे, जिससे तथ्यों को सत्यापित करना बहुत मुश्किल हो गया था। हालांकि, आरोपों की प्रकृति यह है कि 2013 सी आर पी सी की धारा 154 में संशोधन के बाद और ललिता कुमारी बनाम सरकार में सुप्रीम कोर्ट के फैसले के बाद, एफ आई आर दर्ज होनी चाहिए। यूपी (2013) की। हर एफ आई आर में शामिल व्यक्ति की गिरफ्तारी की आवश्यकता नहीं है। हमारी अदालतों ने न्याय सुनिश्चित करने के लिए उचित प्रक्रिया के महत्व पर बार-बार जोर दिया है। निर्दो...